The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there are clearly humans have the ability to express 2x it's just extraordinarily rare So it tends to Happ happen is this if you find somebody that has what we call Pure 2x fibers so these are single fibers that are expressing only 2x a couple of things have happened they've number one they've probably had that muscle fiber de inovated for decades
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
that's really the only time we see it in fact if you look at spinal cord injury folks who've you know had a dinator thing for decades there is high as 50 or 60% of their total fiber type being 2X and so this seems to be the default strategy of if you don't activate or utilize the muscle it eventually is going to fall to 2x