Peter Attia· MD
I mean you'd have to sort of see this studied more rigorously potentially with people who don't have a conflict of interest um which is also something you have to be careful of when you look at this type of literature
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I mean you'd have to sort of see this studied more rigorously potentially with people who don't have a conflict of interest um which is also something you have to be careful of when you look at this type of literature
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.