The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
IGF-1 is 177 many would say that with all the meat I'm eating and with all of the dairy that my igf-1 would be higher but my igf one is fine and igf-1 is beneficial for humans because it's an anabolic type growth factor which is important if you want to retain muscle mass and we know loss of muscle mass is one of the key indicators or precursors of fragility and death eventually
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the older you get the better IGF seems to be presumably because of the preservation of lean tissue