We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
I'm a little bit wary of extrapolating too far from the rodent studies to humans in the context of sarcopenia in particular and in particular I'm talking about Mouse studies to humans mice are not at least the commonly used inbred Mouse strains are not particularly prone to sarcopenia with age
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.