The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
you actually saw that the type the size of the type two fibers was tremendously smaller in the women with the hip fracture than the ones that didn't have the hip fracture even though we matched for almost everything lifestyle and everything
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think you could also make a very compelling case that having smaller type two fibers which means having less power having less Force generating capacity um would make you more susceptible to a fall
I think you could also make a very compelling case that having smaller type 2 fibers which means having less power having less Force generating capacity um would make you more susceptible to a fall
but you actually saw that the Tye the size of the type two fibers was tremendously smaller in the uh women with the hip fracture than the ones that didn't have the hip fracture even though we matched for almost everything lifestyle and everything