The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the amino acids are stored as protein so but is it a real storage Depot now if you ask me and and yourself we hope we we're not losing muscle so we say we don't have a storage Depot but if we end up in a concentration camp then we actually quite happy that we have a storage Depo of amino acids in the form of muscle so it is a storage Depo but hope that we're not using it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we don't have a real storage Depo there's a small free amino acid pool if you compare it with the intact uh protein pool um they always say it's very small in muscle but acutely after a meal it can actually vary a lot so it's a buffer temporary buffer but we don't really have real storage sites for for amino acids
the only place that an amino acid sits in residence in our body is in the muscle. Therefore, if we even get near the edge where we are not getting sufficient intake of amino acids, we don't have a buffer. We don't have a rainy day fund that we can dip into. We immediately start to catabolize or break down muscle.