The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I did notice a paper in actual pigs where they'd seen omega-3 Phi assets that altered the gene expression of an amino acid transporter called lat one and we thought maybe actually this could be one of the mechanisms that we saw in explaining the enhanced protein synthesis and protection of muscle loss in our paper
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but my guess would be actually that it's just the general modification of the lipid or the lipidomal lipid profile of the muscle that then enhances the effectiveness of amino acids so the potentiation is driven largely by the amino acids which is influenced by the lipid profile of the muscle
do you think that there may be a role for omega-3 in perhaps even anabolic resistance by enhancing the response to amino acids and skeletal muscle too in older adults I think I think the jury is still out very much so in this regard