The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
But sardines, not a lot of mercury. They're very high in arsenic though. There's actually a study from Brazil that tested 120 samples of sardines and declared all of them unfit for chronic consumption due to exceeding the limits of arsenic. But there's an asterisk here. The arsenic in sardines is organic arsenic. It's arsenobetane, which the human body can filter out more easily than inorganic arsenic.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.