The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
hunters preferring to hunt prime adult animals over the mova more vulnerable and easily obtained young or old animals because the old animals had more fat younger animals are smaller they have less fat
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
fat not protein seemed to play a very prominent role in the hunters decisions about what animals male versus female females presumably being more fatty to kill and which body parts to discard or take away