The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
here's a meta-analysis of animal fat an animal protein they usually occur together intake on colorectal cancer from 2009 this was definitely available to the researchers in the iarc committee and they say on the basis of the results of this quantitative assessment the available epidemiologic evidence does not appear to support an independent association between animal fat intake or animal protein intake on colorectal cancer
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.