Rhonda Patrick· PhD
so I would say that you know obviously heat stress can be dangerous and so you shouldn't stay into that you shouldn't stay in the sauna like you don't want to give yourself a heatstroke right
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
so I would say that you know obviously heat stress can be dangerous and so you shouldn't stay into that you shouldn't stay in the sauna like you don't want to give yourself a heatstroke right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
You shouldn't it would be detrimental to your health.
You'll never be in a 179-degree-Fahrenheit sauna for that long.
it's important to keep in mind that there's always like a window of you're you're you're engaging in this this kind of stressful activity like physical activity or Del deliberate heat exposure to have this you know response
4–7 sauna sessions per week, 20 minutes at 80°C+, reduce cardiovascular mortality risk by 40% over a decade.
Regular sauna use raises BDNF and improves verbal memory in older adults.
Sauna protocols only generate the longevity effect when sessions exceed 30 minutes.
Hot-tub bathing yields cardiovascular benefits comparable to traditional Finnish sauna at matched core-temp dose.