The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you can see the remarkable correlation between seed oils and diabetes and pre-diabetes which has gone as we reviewed from 0.97 in 1960 up to um well this is both diabetes and pre-diabetes both so you can see they're almost at 50 percent uh today or uh or whenever this ends about 2018 right so again another remarkable correlation
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.