Paul Saladino· MD
LAVAHS has some major flaws as do Finnish and other RCTs that show seed oils to be benign.
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
LAVAHS has some major flaws as do Finnish and other RCTs that show seed oils to be benign.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
The OZO diet Heart The Finnish health study the LA veterans study all of the studies that show in the Interventional context that seed oils are beneficial for humans had some pretty serious methodological flaws