Paul Saladino· MD
two to three percent versus seven to ten percent may not sound like enough but it's or a lot but it's really important to understand that perhaps the the actual effect of those oils is seen between that range
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
two to three percent versus seven to ten percent may not sound like enough but it's or a lot but it's really important to understand that perhaps the the actual effect of those oils is seen between that range
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what the science clearly shows is that the negative effects of these seed oils seem to start at fairly low amounts