The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
isn't it interesting how all of this works out together and when we step outside of what is evolutionarily consistent for humans we see a range of diseases that are all misinterpreted by western medicine but all perhaps have similar causes that being evolutionarily inconsistent behaviors in this case i'm referring to food consumption by humans in an evolutionarily inconsistent pattern what pattern am i thinking of excess linoleic acid leading to metabolic dysfunction
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.