The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and one of the things that i've always struggled with because the more i look into this the stronger my conviction becomes that seed oils are very harmful for humans i i don't want to say that i have complete certainty of that but i have an increasing a very strong suspicion they're the things that are furthest away yeah from what's available in nature yeah and i think that whenever you go away from the natural environment organism that's when you get into trouble
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there is certainly evidence that seed oils are very harmful for humans there's something we have never eaten evolutionarily