The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Phil soof was a very wealthy American businessman who had a heart attack in the 1960s he was convinced like many people were at that time in history that saturated fats from animals were to blame for his heart attack and he used his resources to mount a smear campaign against saturated animal fats and McDonald's french fries
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.