We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
either harvard and tufts and all well i shouldn't say all the majority certainly mainstream western medicine is advocating for lower ldl that's this sharp end of this equation they're advocating for seed oils which lower ldl and as i showed you can lower ldl with seed oils but increase oxidized ldl and lp little a that's not a good thing
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and the AHA continues to advocate for seed oils because they lower LDL and don't you know Tucker everyone knows that lower LDL is better and then the higher anyway this is the this is the great LDL fallacy that that I continue to have many one of the more one of the more amusing papers that's come out was looking at the paradoxical increase in oxidized LDL and LP little a I think in a low-fat High carbohydrate diet which is basically of course what the AHA pushes and as the evidence keeps piling up that the important thing is you know oxidized LDL in the form of LP little a and not LDL it becomes you know more and more into indefensible for them to not address this right we know this pathway we've known since you know the 70s that LDL doesn't kick off atherosclerosis okay
linolic acid-rich oils like canola or soybean raise levels of oxidized LDL and LP ltil a strong risk factors for heart disease