The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
then they've gone through say for this compounding pharmacy that I use we use it in this way this degree of quality control and I say wow that sounds to me again phys have not physically inspected the plants I'm not an expert it sounds to me like some very rigorous quality control
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
wow that sounds to me again phys have not physically inspected the plants I'm not an expert it sounds to me like some very rigorous quality control