The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but I would say that the most powerful read through from our results so far in humans are these other diseases of aging for which we have no treatments so let us take something like the dry version of macular degeneration this is a disease for which there is no treatment
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but we'll have to find out in the clinic and next year we are going with our first molecules into the I do you have an animal model for that No so you have animal models of the wet disease and our molecules work in that model