The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
When you get good of that, you're using the prediction not just to solve a problem, but to create a benefit. Imagine you're a little bit stressed. You got a big day tomorrow. But you've so trained yourself that that place is so predictably tied with sleep that you're stressed. You've got a big day. You've got stuff you're working on. You get into bed, close your eyes, head on pillow, under blankets, start breathing. Then all of a sudden, you fall asleep.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.