We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
I think that the fact that we still can't prove definitively that an elevated LDL cholesterol is a is causes is is causative of heart disease like even even the the studies that purport to show that causation are weak week week studies and show only in most cases a possible association between elevated LDL
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think that the fact that we still can't prove definitively that an elevated LDL cholesterol is a is causes is is causative of heart disease like even even the the studies that purport to show that causation are weak week week studies and show only in most cases a possible association between elevated LDL and so even the lipidologists are are increasingly backing away from Ohio LDL causes heart disease you you know put statins in the water I think that's quickly becoming unpopular in the more learned part of the lipidology community for for good reason because as much research that has been done by companies who stand to profit billions multiple billions of dollars they can't prove it