We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
but when we when we move out of an LDL centric perspective here that may not be a good thing and there are many downsides to statins but when we are solely Opik and we are only looking at the level of LDL in the body we get widely misled
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i think being myopically focused on ldl is a mistake that is harming people they get put on statins they get put on other lipid lowering drugs and they remove some of the most nutrient-rich foods in their diet
i think being myopically focused on ldl is a mistake that is harming people they get put on statins they get put on other
i think being myopically focused on ldl is a mistake that is harming people they get put on statins they get put on other lipid lowering drugs and they remove some of the most nutrient-rich foods in their diet