The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and you know I me there have been documentaries made on how statens are poisoned and they're killing people and while not everybody or even maybe most people are aware of that plenty of people who spend any amount of time online are and so that is I do spend a lot of time with patients who come to see me because I have some openness to at least having that conversation with them
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
a equally maybe even slightly large group of patients who don't take them because they're afraid of them and uh and I I don't mean that to be perjorative I think there's been a tremendous campaign a propaganda campaign to demonize statens that's been going on for a long time 25 or 30 years and it's been very successful and people are terrified of stattin