The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
That's really a link that I think between inflammation and heart disease. It's also the reason why you should always get your cholesterol measured more than once because you maybe sick or stress and you're inflamed and then your cholesterol is really high, and your doctor might go, "Whoa. Let's get you on statins." So maybe that's not the best scenario.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
You maybe sick or stress and you're inflamed and then your cholesterol is really high, and your doctor might go, "Whoa. Let's get you on statins."