The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there are some patients that have already have a CBD and they don't want to take a medicine and you know at this point it's like too late you know diet's important but you already have plaque in your arteries you're pretty far along in the process and we need to do everything to prevent further progression and even reverse and we know from you know the Ibis studies that high intensity statins and significant LDL lowering can cause atheroma volume regression
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.