The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in primary prevention there's really a very very miniscule difference in when you give people a statin these are people who have not had a coronary event and it leads to a number nning is a treat of 63 which is pretty significant
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
no it was probably 40 to 50 and west of Scotland nobody know is good but these are nightmare primary prevention