We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
every major guideline in the world bases their selection of subjects for statin prevention on the 10-year risk of disease and and that was a huge step forward in 1980 and 1990 but but it totally or not totally but it it it very fundamentally makes prevention alma of premature disease almost impossible
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what that leads to is that every major guideline in the world bases their selection of subjects for Statin prevention on the 10-year risk of disease and that was a huge step forward in 1980 and 1990 but it totally or not totally but it very fundamentally makes prevention of premature disease almost impossible