We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
but I think the burden of proof is on us to show that that is not risky and if we did a CT andram and it showed you didn't have any plaque and all the calcium is are extravascular somewhere else then sure i' I'd be okay with that but that if we do it and we see plaque I'm not I'm not aware of any data that would say let's not treat you
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.