The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the lowering of testosterone in the study was modest it was not a lot 66 nanom per liter which is not a whole lot if you use a conversion tool like this you'll see that that's only 19 nanograms per deciliter but it's a significant finding in the trial and is it worse in higher doses perhaps
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.