We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
I would like to base that answer on the basis of following calcium scores on following patients clinically for example if you have a calcium score of zero there is no clinical benefit of stating taking statins for ten years
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
don't fear a high LDL in the setting of a healthy lifestyle and a local hydrate diet statins are not worth it