Paul Saladino· MD
and I think the reason is right because if you admit that problem then you have to you open up that can of worms of well why are we poisoning our mitochondria in you know intentionally it's a big deal.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and I think the reason is right because if you admit that problem then you have to you open up that can of worms of well why are we poisoning our mitochondria in you know intentionally it's a big deal.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.