The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I have a patient of mine who uh came to see me with a tremendous amount of skepticism had every risk factor was probably having Anga when he first came to see me and I recommended that he start taking a stat in that first day and he was afraid to because of stuff that he'd read about how dangerous they were he ended up needless to say a few months later in the ER with an aami and uh fortunately the outcome was good he ended up with a stin he's stayed on a Staten ever since then
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.