We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
but I'm sure a lot of people are in that position over the course of this weekend I've had multiple people come up to me and say hey I have a positive calcium score and I'll do a whole episode about calcium scores guys but I think that you know we were able to talk about a lot of these statin trials and why statins are probably not the answer and that really statins have a high degrees of side effects for people
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.