Paul Saladino· MD
I would actually respectfully disagree with you here and say that I don't I think that even if someone has had a heart attack I do not feel that the benefits of statins outweigh the risks
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
I would actually respectfully disagree with you here and say that I don't I think that even if someone has had a heart attack I do not feel that the benefits of statins outweigh the risks
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
personally if you have had a heart attack and you go on a statin and you're getting absolutely no adverse effects stay on it for almost everyone else you know I just really don't think about if it's that way the potential damage and harm that these things cause that's my my position on this
I don't think there's any evidence that statins are good for humans long term if you haven't had a heart attack