Peter Attia· MD
the reality of it is it can be very positive from a vascular standpoint can be positive from an inflammatory standpoint it could be negative from a cholesterol biosynthesis standpoint in a susceptible individual
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the reality of it is it can be very positive from a vascular standpoint can be positive from an inflammatory standpoint it could be negative from a cholesterol biosynthesis standpoint in a susceptible individual
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.