Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
the question remains will there ever be a study done that tests this question specifically as the primary outcome in other words where the study is powered to ask the question does the use of a Statin increase decrease or have no effect on the risk of Alzheimer's disease and Dementia or will we instead be forced to rely on these secondary outcomes which are always subject to some potential misinterpretation
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.