Peter Attia· MD
you know for a while had that category X and so this actually led to overabundance of caution with just not treating women of reproductive age with statins at all because of fear that they might accidentally become pregnant
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you know for a while had that category X and so this actually led to overabundance of caution with just not treating women of reproductive age with statins at all because of fear that they might accidentally become pregnant
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.