The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I would love to see a different set of data looking at lipophilic versus hydrophilic satins is it possible that lipophilic satins are worse for dementia and memory and hydrophilic statins don't affect memory in a negative way
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
oh the other point I want to make Rhonda this actually surprised me there was no difference between uh hydrophobic and hydrophilic statins with respect to the to these outomes no difference whatsoever