Peter Attia· MD
Yeah. you'll see the same benefit
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Yeah. you'll see the same benefit
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So your argument you so so because there's an argument to be made which is not necessarily the argument we're having today but I I'll and I can't I won't even attempt to steal man it but but I'll just I'll just state it. The argument is that um if you look at all the literature of statins and you see reduction in mortality that doesn't mean that it's because it's lowering LDL. It could be because it's doing something else. It's lowering inflammation or it's doing something else. And you're arguing that that's that's a tough argument to make in light of the all of the MR coupled with all the clinical trial data.