The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there is an organization that is headed by Sir Rory Collins of Oxford that has all of the raw data for all of the Staten trials and that raw data regarding side effects is not available to any third party researchers who wish to examine the true rates of Staten side effects
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the CTT collaboration is a branch of the clinical trial Service Unit at Oxford uh demands the principal investigators of the Staten trials release the raw data on efficacy and side effects there is growing on ease that the ctsu has received over 260 million pounds in research funding from the pharmac industry the vast majority of it from manufacturers of cholesterol lowering drugs they will not let third parties look at the side effects of statin drugs