Paul Saladino· MD
basically after about two years seventy five percent given up sixty three percent of them given up said it was due to adverse effects
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
basically after about two years seventy five percent given up sixty three percent of them given up said it was due to adverse effects
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
5-10% of people will suffer as you have, at which point the treatment is stopped.