Paul Saladino· MD
where statins where the benefit probably comes in for statins is not in dramatically lowering the number of LDL particles it's in there anti-inflammatory effect and it just shows you that inflammation is the problem
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
where statins where the benefit probably comes in for statins is not in dramatically lowering the number of LDL particles it's in there anti-inflammatory effect and it just shows you that inflammation is the problem
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if inflammation is the problem the answer is not a pharmaceutical to suppress inflammation whether it's steroids or chemotherapy or statin drugs the answer is finding the source of the inflammation and removing it