Paul Saladino· MD
so that's an interesting thing to me that there's really no evidence that I've seen that red meat causes any inflammation
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so that's an interesting thing to me that there's really no evidence that I've seen that red meat causes any inflammation
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I am willing to bet a bitcoin that if you read to the study and you put red meat in with the prudent pattern that it would be also associated with a lower pattern of inflammation
but red meat is an incredibly nutrient rich food for humans it's never been shown to be inflammatory for humans in unprocessed forms