The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
recently published study came to the conclusion that red meat does not cause heart disease why are we not surprised this study by the European Society for clinical nutrition and Metabolism was a mandelian randomization a type of research that is very highly regarded in the scientific community and it found that across all four cardiovascular disease outcomes there was no causal relationship with red meat
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.