The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in Asia meat is associated with royalty meat is associated with people who have lots of money and it's seen as a an affluent thing to eat meat so what do we see in the studies in Asia the people that eat the most meat live the longest and the best
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
The Narrative is that red meat is associated with affluence so who eats more red meat people that are more financially well off and we know that a superior financial status is correlated consistently with Better Health outcomes