Paul Saladino· MD
there's never been a study where they give people red meat I would love to see that study where we have a group of people and we just feed them red meat for ten years and we look to see if they develop heart disease
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's never been a study where they give people red meat I would love to see that study where we have a group of people and we just feed them red meat for ten years and we look to see if they develop heart disease
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
when physicians are telling patients maybe some of you that red meat is not good for you for condition x y or z i'm thinking to myself what in the heck is that based on because i have never seen an interventional trial to show that it must be based on misleading epidemiology