The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when a person is under anesthesia they can be stretched into positions that they never imagine if they're not under anesthesia and you might say well okay so what but they're probably going to get hurt but they don't right like you can take a person who can't touch their toes and again when they're under anesthesia you could almost fold them in half right you could get their palms past their toes and when they wake up from anesthesia they will not have torn a hamstring
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.