The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the problem with the hip flexors is that we're always sitting so even if they're strong they're often tight because we're always in this position so it's important to see how how your hip flexors are make sure that they're flexible because an imbalance in the in the flexibility of that muscle group will also impact the antagonistic muscles in the back the the gluteus maximus which extend the hip and the hamstrings which also extend the hip
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the problem with the hip flexors is that we're always sitting so even if they're strong they're often tight because we're we're always in this position so it's important to see how how your hip flexors are make sure that they're flexible because a an imbalance in the in the flexibility of that muscle group will also impact the antagonistic muscles in the back the the glutitis Maximus which extend the hip and the hamstrings which also extend the hip