The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
well now if we do like a preacher curl which is when your arm is out in front of you you're shortening the biceps part that cross the shoulder joint and you can still work across the elbow joint and it will not aggravate your shoulder
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what if that's a nagging shoulder problem aha well now if we do like a pre-ra curl which is when your arms out in front of you you're shortening the biceps part that cross the shoulder joint and you can still work across elbow joint and it will not aggravate your shoulder